Saturday, December 17, 2011

Frog Dissection

       In my science class, we finished the body systems unit, and to end it, we dissected frogs. When we got our frogs, we put on our gloves, and safety goggles and took out the dissecting tools. We used the scissors to cut through the layer of skin, and then the muscle underneath it. We pinned that back, and then looked inside the frog. We saw alot of eggs, which looked like small black beads. When I saw the eggs, I knew that our frog was female. We then had to remove all the eggs to see the other organs. After we did that, I had to break the frogs chest bones to see the heart. The heart in our frog was small, and red with a white film over it. Directly under the heart is the liver, which looked like a large brown three leaf clover.  Under the liver were the lungs and the gallbladder. The lungs were red and shriveled up, and the gallblader was dark green and small. It was next to the left lung. Below the liver was the stomach. The stomach took up most of the inside of the frog, and was a peach color. We cut out the stomach to see if there was anything in it, but there wasn't so we can assume our frog didn't eat before it died. Our frog also didn't have any fat bodies, so it probably just got out of hibernation before it died. On the sides of the frog, under where the eggs used to be were the ovaries. They were peach in color, and looked like ramen noodles packed closeley together. Connecting to the end of the stomach was the small intestine, which was slightly covered with a green substance that looked like swamp muck. The large intestine connected to the end of the small intestine, and ended at the cloaca which is like the anus.
           This dissection showed me that our body's organ systems aren't all seperate.In the frog, every body part was connected to something else. It also really made me see how similar a human body is to a frog's body. The dissection showed me that if you're missing one organ sytem, you're body won't run properly.

The pictures are from:
http://www.sciencephoto.com/image/378478/530wm/Z7000880-Female_Bullfrog-SPL.jpg
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumblarge_557/1290002082nQ7D1d.jpg
http://myclipsblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/see-through-frogs.jpg?w=570

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Digestion Lab

In science class, we did a lab that helped us understand how digestion works. We had four test tubes labled A, B, C, and D. We put three pieces of cut up egg white in each test tube.  In test tube A, we put in 10 mL of meat tenderizer (A.k.a pepsin) and there was no immediate reaction. In test tube B we put in 5 ml of pepsin, and 5 mL of water and again, we didn't see an immediate reaction. In test tube C, we put in 10 mL of hydrochloric acid, and we could see the liquid bubbling, and small holes already forming in the egg white. In test tube D, we put 5mL of pepsin, and 5 mL of hydrochloric acid, we also didn't see an immediate reaction. We used strips of blue litmus paper to see how acidic the solution was. In test tube A, our litmus paper stayed blue. In test tube B, it stayed blue, but was wet. In test tube C, our litmus paper turned an orange/pink color, because it was acidic, and in test tube D, it also turned orande/pink because it was acidic. The next day, we looked at our test tubes again, and there were some major diffrences. In test tube A, the egg white was almost all disintegrated, but in test tube B, there wasn't a reaction. In test tube C, the eggwhite was almost all gone because the acid had broken it down, but in test tube D, there wasn't a reaction. We used the litmus paper again, and the paper stayed blue for test tubes A and B.  The litmus paper turned orange/pink again for test tube C , but not for test tube D. The first day the litmus paper changed but now it didn't because the acid probably wasn't there anymore. This lab was a good way to show how the digestive system worked, because the hydrochloric acid in our stomachs works the same way.

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Chicken Wing Dissection Lab

In science class our teacher dissected a chicken wing, and we observed the different parts. First we looked at the skin, which was bumpy because feathers had been pulled out. Then after she made a cut, we saw the fat which was right underneath the skin. After the fat, we saw the muscles, which she pulled and squeezed, and the wing moved accordingly. Then we looked at the tendons, which were at the end of the muscles, and attached to the bone. After our teacher pulled off all of the muscle, we saw the joints which connected the bones, and the ligaments that were connected to the joints. Lastly, we saw the cartilage which helps the bone move without them touching each other. This lab really helped me understand the different types of tissue better.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Diffusion Lab

          In our science class today, we tried a diffusion lab. We put cornstarch and water in a plastic baggie, and put water and iodine in a beaker. We then put the baggie into the iodine solution and waited 15 minutes. The cornstarch in the baggie was supposed to turn purple, but it didn't work because the baggies were too strong, and the iodine didn't get through. I think the lab would have worked if we had cheaper baggies or if we waited longer.

Monday, May 23, 2011

Tree Hugger? Or Not?

In recently read an article about a type of vine that curls around a tree's trunks. In Barro Colorado Island, Panama, there is a type of vine (Liana) that curls around trees and grows up to take their sunlight and water. Scientists have come to the startling conclusion that these vines are slowly taking over tropical rain forests. These vines are parasites that use the trees as their host. The Liana are a great source of food to animals during the dry season, because they flower and fruit at that time when most trees don't. They also provide a sort of "highway" in the canopy to the animals because they snake through the trees when they grow. This weed takes most of the sunlight, water and nutrients that a tree needs. They can also stop a tree's growth and over time kill it. I think that we should get rid of this vine, because our rainforest's are already small, and we don't want them to get any smaller because of a problem that we can fix.

The article I read can be found at the following website:http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/24/science/24vine.html?ref=science